I think they are all very useful for digital archiving, especially for those organizations on a tight budget or smaller organization. They can also be used by big organizations too. I think dspace would be the best for ingesting large quantities of data and linking remote organizations together. For more focus on meta data, omeka and drupal would be best. As I've said before, since drupal is more a general library product, it has more features than are really needed for most digital archives. I liked dspace and eprints for having the configurable approval process for someone to look over the submissions and give the okay before a submission is put online.
Usability and searchability are very important also. You need to people that are going to want to use them. I don't recall any of them as being difficult to browse or search with. omeka was one of the more inviting ones from my point of view as far as the layout and the thumbnails being shown. dspace was the one that has the least appealing appearance if I remember correctly.
Standards are important, and to have a standardized way to harvest meta data is a very good thing to have to be able to make more archives visible to the maximum number of people. jhove is also important to make sure that your archive records are in a standard form that can be used by the most people and will likely be standard for years into the future.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment